Solomon Brothers #Bitcoin Notice: #Satoshi Wallets In Question

Solomon Brothers Notice: Scam or Legal Maneuver?

I've been closely following the developments around the Solomon Brothers notice regarding 80,000 BTC from early Bitcoin wallets, and today I wanted to share my perspective on whether this is a scam or something more calculated.

Here's the question that keeps bothering me: If the Solomon Brothers notice is indeed a scam, how exactly did the supposed scammer move BTC from the early Genesis wallets without having the private keys? It's like a magic trick – David Copperfield level stuff – that nobody seems able to explain.

The notice provided a deadline of October 5th for anyone claiming ownership of these wallets to come forward. As of recording my video on October 6th, I haven't seen any updates about the BTC being sold yet, but the legal mechanism at work here is fascinating.

What we're seeing appears to be basic due process – notice and opportunity. If someone has legitimate control of these wallets (through possessing the private keys), they're giving "Satoshi" or anyone else with a claim the opportunity to step forward before they sell the coins. This is a classic "cover your ass" legal maneuver.

Let's be realistic about who has both motive and legal right to these wallets. Court cases have already established that Craig Wright has rights to these wallets (though notably, he's legally prohibited from claiming he's Satoshi). It's highly unlikely that someone stole the keys from him and is now executing this elaborate notice scheme.

What we're witnessing appears to be a masterful performance by someone extremely knowledgeable about Bitcoin who's demonstrating that "Satoshi is gone" – just a fiction that no longer exists. The lack of anyone stepping forward to claim these wallets speaks volumes.

On a different note, I'm excited about heading to the Bitcoin hackathon in Medford, Oregon this coming weekend. I'll be arriving Thursday and judging on Friday. I've heard rumors about some fascinating companies participating, including a Twitch-like platform being developed by John Calhoun and an energy sector project from Metawatt. If you're in the area, come join us for what promises to be an innovative event followed by some weekend celebration!

Check out the full video here.

IS Blockchain the Beast System? Separating Truth from Deception

The conversation around blockchain technology has reached a critical juncture. As governments worldwide push toward Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and surveillance capabilities expand, many are rightfully questioning whether blockchain itself might become the prophesied "beast system" of total control.

I recently watched a thoughtful discussion between Nino Rodriguez and Rob Cunningham addressing these concerns, and while they raised important points about zero knowledge proofs as a privacy solution, I believe they missed some fundamental distinctions that demand closer examination.

First, we need to recognize that not all blockchains are created equal. The difference between a truly decentralized, peer-to-peer system and a centralized blockchain with pre-mined tokens is the difference between financial liberation and sophisticated digital slavery.

Take XRP, for example, which was mentioned as potentially being "the internet of value." Before accepting such claims, we should ask critical questions: Was this cryptocurrency pre-mined? The answer is yes - founders like Jed McCaleb (who previously ran Mt. Gox before its infamous collapse) and others allocated massive portions to themselves before public distribution. This isn't decentralization; it's a new form of centralization with different controllers.

Can XRP actually scale to handle "the internet of value"? Would it need to process billions or even trillions of transactions daily? And if so, has this capability been demonstrated beyond marketing claims? These questions require technical examination beyond what most influencers provide.

The upcoming Clarity Act will likely differentiate between mature, decentralized blockchains (which would qualify as commodities) and centrally controlled tokens. A truly mature blockchain cannot have a central point of origin or pre-mined tokens - these features make it functionally similar to a central bank with different branding.

What many don't realize is that Satoshi Nakamoto's original Bitcoin design was specifically created to solve these problems. It established a truly peer-to-peer electronic cash system without pre-mining, without central control, and with the capacity to scale globally. This design has been preserved despite numerous attempts to alter or control it.

The patent landscape surrounding blockchain technology reveals much about the power structures at play. The formation of the COPA patent alliance and their aggressive actions against certain figures demonstrates how threatened established interests are by truly decentralized technology. These aren't actions taken against irrelevant systems; they're defensive measures against existential threats to centralized control.

So is blockchain the beast system? The technology itself is neutral, but implementation matters enormously. A centralized blockchain controlled by banks or pre-mined by insiders could indeed become part of a control system more sophisticated than anything previously possible. But a truly decentralized, peer-to-peer system with proper privacy protections represents the opposite - a path toward financial sovereignty.

I encourage everyone, especially influencers with large platforms like Rob, to go beyond surface-level research. Actually use these systems. Attend events where real development is happening. Meet the people building on these technologies. This Thursday, I'll be in Medford, Oregon judging the BSV Hackathon where developers are creating applications on the original Bitcoin protocol.

The stakes couldn't be higher. As we transition into a digital financial world, the distinction between true peer-to-peer systems and disguised central control will determine whether technology liberates or enslaves us. Choose wisely.

Check out the full video here.

Advanced #FatLoss: How I Target Visceral Fat Around Organs

How I Target Visceral Fat With Lithium Orotate and Strategic Training

I've been getting a lot of questions lately about my physique and how I maintain it, particularly from Sebastian who works with the Teranode group. He was curious about the lithium orotate supplement I've mentioned in previous videos, so I thought I'd share my complete approach to targeting visceral fat - the most dangerous type of fat in our bodies.

First, let me explain why visceral fat matters so much. Unlike the subcutaneous fat that sits just under your skin (which might affect your appearance but isn't necessarily harmful), visceral fat wraps around your internal organs like your heart and liver. This is the fat that's associated with inflammation, disease risk, and accelerated aging. You can look relatively lean and still have dangerous amounts of visceral fat.

I first learned about lithium orotate from Dr. Sean O'Meira when I was following the Warrior Diet. As someone who's naturally very hyperactive and high-energy, I started taking it primarily for its calming effects - it helps me stay focused, balanced, and less reactive to stressors. But what surprised me was noticing my physique tightening up without changing anything else about my routine.

My training approach is unconventional but incredibly effective. I only do high-intensity workouts approximately every six days (yes, just once a week), alternating between push and pull routines. I'm talking about one brutally intense set per exercise - heavy squats for 7-8 reps, incline press to failure, standing press, deadlifts, and so on. It's consolidated training inspired by Mike Mentzer with some band work I learned from John Jaquish.

The key distinction I want to emphasize is between aerobic and anaerobic activity. I do get my steps in every day - about 3.5-4 miles of walking - because that's what our bodies are designed to do. But I never jog or do traditional cardio. Instead, I do 1-3 sprint sessions weekly - 4-5 all-out 50-60 yard dashes or vertical jump training. This is pure anaerobic work that triggers completely different hormonal and metabolic responses than steady-state cardio.

Perhaps the most transformative aspect of my approach has been consistent intermittent fasting. For over 800 consecutive days, I haven't eaten anything before 5:00 PM. This is non-negotiable for me now. When your eating window is compressed like this, you gain incredible awareness about what you're consuming. I generally eat the same foods each day (with occasional exceptions for social meals), which removes decision fatigue and ensures I'm getting consistent nutrition.

I've experimented extensively with different diets, including strict carnivore/lion diet. While that approach can be incredible for addressing specific health issues (especially inflammatory conditions), I've found that a more balanced diet works best for maintenance once you've achieved optimal health. The key indicator I watch for is mucus production - if you're constantly dealing with phlegm or mucus issues, that's a clear signal something in your diet isn't working for you.

Alongside lithium orotate (I use the KAL brand purchased from a local health store, never Amazon), I also take NAC to support glutathione production. These supplements, combined with my training and fasting protocol, have been remarkably effective at keeping visceral fat at bay.

I should mention that last year I tried dry fasting once (no food or water) at the recommendation of Waters Above. It was possibly the most challenging thing I've ever done, largely because of my coffee addiction. While incredibly effective, I'm not planning to repeat it anytime soon - I'm just not ready to give up my daily coffee!

The results speak for themselves. I'm in better shape than guys half my age at the gym, and I've done it all drug-free. My approach isn't about vanity - though feeling confident in your physique is certainly a nice benefit. It's about optimizing health from the inside out by targeting the fat that actually threatens your longevity.

Check out the full video here.

Declaration of Military #Accountability: What You Can Verify

The Military Accountability Declaration: What You Need to Know

I've been looking into something significant that's not getting much mainstream attention - a document called the "Declaration of Military Accountability" dated January 4th, 2024, which you can find right on Congress.gov.

What struck me immediately about this document is that it's not some anonymous manifesto. Over 231 military officers put their actual names on this declaration, stating that certain military leadership has betrayed their oath of office. That's a serious claim with serious potential consequences for those making it.

When someone joins the military, they take a solemn oath to "support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic." This isn't just ceremonial - it's the bedrock principle that separates our military from those of authoritarian regimes. According to this declaration, led by figures including Ivan Rakelin, many high-ranking officers have failed to uphold this oath.

What I find particularly compelling is that many signatories are active duty officers, while others have been injured in service. These aren't armchair critics - these are people with skin in the game who've risked everything for their country.

There's also discussion about a purported declaration and summons from the Commander-in-Chief calling these military officers together. I want to be completely transparent with you - I don't have 100% verification this specific document is authentic. I understand Sheila Holm reportedly received it from active duty personnel, and there are claims from those with White House connections that it's legitimate. But without seeing definitive proof myself, I can only report what's being said.

When I talk about "restoring the republic," I'm not referencing fringe theories. I'm talking about returning to fundamental constitutional principles - government for the people, by the people. The simple yet profound concepts in our Constitution, especially those first ten amendments, that established our nation's foundation.

The most important takeaway is that the original declaration on Congress.gov is absolutely real and verifiable. You can look it up yourself, see the signatures, and even find interviews with some of the signatories online.

In these divisive times, I believe our path forward requires unity regardless of political party, race, or gender. We need to come together around our shared values and founding principles. This declaration represents military officers taking a stand for those principles - and that's something worth paying attention to, regardless of your political leanings.

Check out the full video here.

Craig Wright vs Satoshi: The #Bitcoin Wallet Mystery Unfolding

The $8.6 Billion Bitcoin Movement: What's Really Happening Before October 5th

I've been deep in the rabbit hole of what might be the most significant event in Bitcoin's history, and I want to share my findings with you. On July 4th, 2025 (American Independence Day), something extraordinary happened: $8.6 billion worth of Bitcoin was simultaneously moved from eight wallets that had been dormant for over 14 years.

This wasn't just any random transaction. Each wallet contained exactly 10,000 BTC in perfect symmetry, and all were moved with surgical precision in what appears to be a carefully orchestrated demonstration. What makes this even more fascinating is the legal notice inscribed directly on the blockchain, giving the original owner 90 days (until October 5th) to come forward before the funds are considered abandoned.

When I first saw this news, I immediately recognized the connection to the Kleiman v. Wright case. For those unfamiliar, this was a massive five-year legal battle that essentially established Craig Wright's control over Satoshi's wallets as a matter of law. Despite what some might claim, Wright didn't "lose" this case – he paid a relatively small fraction ($150 million) of the estimated $60 billion fortune, with the court acknowledging his control over these assets.

What we're witnessing now appears to be one of two possibilities: either Craig Wright himself is orchestrating this as part of a larger plan involving Bitcoin SV (BSV), or someone has somehow obtained the keys to these wallets. Based on everything I've studied, including Wright's continued public presence and ongoing activities, I believe the former is far more likely.

The legal strategy here is particularly fascinating. The entity behind this movement is applying adverse possession principles – concepts traditionally used for real estate – to the digital world of cryptocurrency. In essence, they're saying: "I've taken possession of abandoned digital property, made it public, offered a contestation period, and without objection, I'll become the legitimate owner."

What strikes me most about this operation is its meticulous execution. The blockchain messages contain references to the TV show "Lost" (the famous numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42), suggesting this is as much a conceptual performance as it is a financial move. There's an artistic element to this demonstration of cryptographic power.

The big question remains: what happens on October 5th? If the announced sale takes place, we could see significant market impact. But what if, instead of converting to fiat, these funds move to BSV? Wright himself recently stated, "Bitcoin doesn't fork, it scales" and "the original Bitcoin chain is called BSV." Could this be foreshadowing his intentions?

I believe we're witnessing a sophisticated play to not only claim abandoned wallets but potentially reshape the narrative around which chain represents Satoshi's original vision. By following proper legal procedures and giving due process, whoever is behind this movement is positioning themselves to withstand the inevitable scrutiny that will come with liquidating billions in cryptocurrency.

This October 5th date will undoubtedly mark a turning point for Bitcoin. Whether you believe Craig Wright is Satoshi or not, the legal and financial implications of this movement are impossible to ignore. I'll be watching closely as we approach this deadline, and I encourage you to stay informed about what could be a watershed moment in cryptocurrency history.

Check out the full video here.

Satoshi's $10 Billion #Bitcoin Move: October 5th Warning Explained

Uncovering the Satoshi Bitcoin Mystery: October 5th Deadline Approaches

I've been following the Satoshi Bitcoin wallet situation closely, and I have to say, things are getting incredibly interesting as we approach October 5th. If you haven't been keeping up with this saga, let me catch you up on what could be one of the most significant events in Bitcoin history.

Back in July, we witnessed something extraordinary: approximately $9-10 billion worth of Bitcoin from wallets believed to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto (Bitcoin's mysterious creator) was moved to exchanges. This wasn't just a simple transfer; messages were left on the blockchain indicating these funds might be liquidated on October 5th.

What fascinates me most about this situation is the careful legal process being followed. A notice was placed directly on the blockchain giving a 90-day window for anyone with legitimate claim to these coins to come forward, either by signing the wallet addresses or contacting the specified law firm. This is essentially due process in action within the crypto world.

I recently had a thought-provoking conversation with Dimmitri about the ethics of claiming potentially abandoned coins. Think about it this way: if you found a key fob containing Bitcoin keys, what would be the responsible thing to do? You can't just take them to the police or FBI. The most ethical approach would be to announce your finding and give the rightful owner a chance to claim them, which is exactly what's happening here on a much larger scale.

From my analysis, there are really only two possibilities here: either Craig Wright (who has claimed to be Satoshi and has been involved in legal cases regarding these addresses) controls these wallets, or someone else has obtained the keys and is going through proper legal procedures to establish ownership.

What we're witnessing might effectively be the "death" of Satoshi as a persona. If the real Satoshi doesn't come forward by October 5th to sign these messages, it essentially confirms they're either gone or unable to access their keys. The crypto world will never be the same.

I'm particularly excited about exploring this topic further with my audience. I've recently partnered with Lex, an original Bitcoin expert who previously worked with Twitch and Orange Gateway, to help elevate my channel's content. Together, we'll be diving deeper into stories like this one.

This October 5th deadline represents a fascinating intersection of cryptocurrency, law, and the enduring mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto. The outcome could have significant implications for Bitcoin's narrative and possibly even its market.

Check out the full video here.