Solomon Brothers #Bitcoin Notice: #Satoshi Wallets In Question

Solomon Brothers Notice: Scam or Legal Maneuver?

I've been closely following the developments around the Solomon Brothers notice regarding 80,000 BTC from early Bitcoin wallets, and today I wanted to share my perspective on whether this is a scam or something more calculated.

Here's the question that keeps bothering me: If the Solomon Brothers notice is indeed a scam, how exactly did the supposed scammer move BTC from the early Genesis wallets without having the private keys? It's like a magic trick – David Copperfield level stuff – that nobody seems able to explain.

The notice provided a deadline of October 5th for anyone claiming ownership of these wallets to come forward. As of recording my video on October 6th, I haven't seen any updates about the BTC being sold yet, but the legal mechanism at work here is fascinating.

What we're seeing appears to be basic due process – notice and opportunity. If someone has legitimate control of these wallets (through possessing the private keys), they're giving "Satoshi" or anyone else with a claim the opportunity to step forward before they sell the coins. This is a classic "cover your ass" legal maneuver.

Let's be realistic about who has both motive and legal right to these wallets. Court cases have already established that Craig Wright has rights to these wallets (though notably, he's legally prohibited from claiming he's Satoshi). It's highly unlikely that someone stole the keys from him and is now executing this elaborate notice scheme.

What we're witnessing appears to be a masterful performance by someone extremely knowledgeable about Bitcoin who's demonstrating that "Satoshi is gone" – just a fiction that no longer exists. The lack of anyone stepping forward to claim these wallets speaks volumes.

On a different note, I'm excited about heading to the Bitcoin hackathon in Medford, Oregon this coming weekend. I'll be arriving Thursday and judging on Friday. I've heard rumors about some fascinating companies participating, including a Twitch-like platform being developed by John Calhoun and an energy sector project from Metawatt. If you're in the area, come join us for what promises to be an innovative event followed by some weekend celebration!

Check out the full video here.

IS Blockchain the Beast System? Separating Truth from Deception

The conversation around blockchain technology has reached a critical juncture. As governments worldwide push toward Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and surveillance capabilities expand, many are rightfully questioning whether blockchain itself might become the prophesied "beast system" of total control.

I recently watched a thoughtful discussion between Nino Rodriguez and Rob Cunningham addressing these concerns, and while they raised important points about zero knowledge proofs as a privacy solution, I believe they missed some fundamental distinctions that demand closer examination.

First, we need to recognize that not all blockchains are created equal. The difference between a truly decentralized, peer-to-peer system and a centralized blockchain with pre-mined tokens is the difference between financial liberation and sophisticated digital slavery.

Take XRP, for example, which was mentioned as potentially being "the internet of value." Before accepting such claims, we should ask critical questions: Was this cryptocurrency pre-mined? The answer is yes - founders like Jed McCaleb (who previously ran Mt. Gox before its infamous collapse) and others allocated massive portions to themselves before public distribution. This isn't decentralization; it's a new form of centralization with different controllers.

Can XRP actually scale to handle "the internet of value"? Would it need to process billions or even trillions of transactions daily? And if so, has this capability been demonstrated beyond marketing claims? These questions require technical examination beyond what most influencers provide.

The upcoming Clarity Act will likely differentiate between mature, decentralized blockchains (which would qualify as commodities) and centrally controlled tokens. A truly mature blockchain cannot have a central point of origin or pre-mined tokens - these features make it functionally similar to a central bank with different branding.

What many don't realize is that Satoshi Nakamoto's original Bitcoin design was specifically created to solve these problems. It established a truly peer-to-peer electronic cash system without pre-mining, without central control, and with the capacity to scale globally. This design has been preserved despite numerous attempts to alter or control it.

The patent landscape surrounding blockchain technology reveals much about the power structures at play. The formation of the COPA patent alliance and their aggressive actions against certain figures demonstrates how threatened established interests are by truly decentralized technology. These aren't actions taken against irrelevant systems; they're defensive measures against existential threats to centralized control.

So is blockchain the beast system? The technology itself is neutral, but implementation matters enormously. A centralized blockchain controlled by banks or pre-mined by insiders could indeed become part of a control system more sophisticated than anything previously possible. But a truly decentralized, peer-to-peer system with proper privacy protections represents the opposite - a path toward financial sovereignty.

I encourage everyone, especially influencers with large platforms like Rob, to go beyond surface-level research. Actually use these systems. Attend events where real development is happening. Meet the people building on these technologies. This Thursday, I'll be in Medford, Oregon judging the BSV Hackathon where developers are creating applications on the original Bitcoin protocol.

The stakes couldn't be higher. As we transition into a digital financial world, the distinction between true peer-to-peer systems and disguised central control will determine whether technology liberates or enslaves us. Choose wisely.

Check out the full video here.

Advanced #FatLoss: How I Target Visceral Fat Around Organs

How I Target Visceral Fat With Lithium Orotate and Strategic Training

I've been getting a lot of questions lately about my physique and how I maintain it, particularly from Sebastian who works with the Teranode group. He was curious about the lithium orotate supplement I've mentioned in previous videos, so I thought I'd share my complete approach to targeting visceral fat - the most dangerous type of fat in our bodies.

First, let me explain why visceral fat matters so much. Unlike the subcutaneous fat that sits just under your skin (which might affect your appearance but isn't necessarily harmful), visceral fat wraps around your internal organs like your heart and liver. This is the fat that's associated with inflammation, disease risk, and accelerated aging. You can look relatively lean and still have dangerous amounts of visceral fat.

I first learned about lithium orotate from Dr. Sean O'Meira when I was following the Warrior Diet. As someone who's naturally very hyperactive and high-energy, I started taking it primarily for its calming effects - it helps me stay focused, balanced, and less reactive to stressors. But what surprised me was noticing my physique tightening up without changing anything else about my routine.

My training approach is unconventional but incredibly effective. I only do high-intensity workouts approximately every six days (yes, just once a week), alternating between push and pull routines. I'm talking about one brutally intense set per exercise - heavy squats for 7-8 reps, incline press to failure, standing press, deadlifts, and so on. It's consolidated training inspired by Mike Mentzer with some band work I learned from John Jaquish.

The key distinction I want to emphasize is between aerobic and anaerobic activity. I do get my steps in every day - about 3.5-4 miles of walking - because that's what our bodies are designed to do. But I never jog or do traditional cardio. Instead, I do 1-3 sprint sessions weekly - 4-5 all-out 50-60 yard dashes or vertical jump training. This is pure anaerobic work that triggers completely different hormonal and metabolic responses than steady-state cardio.

Perhaps the most transformative aspect of my approach has been consistent intermittent fasting. For over 800 consecutive days, I haven't eaten anything before 5:00 PM. This is non-negotiable for me now. When your eating window is compressed like this, you gain incredible awareness about what you're consuming. I generally eat the same foods each day (with occasional exceptions for social meals), which removes decision fatigue and ensures I'm getting consistent nutrition.

I've experimented extensively with different diets, including strict carnivore/lion diet. While that approach can be incredible for addressing specific health issues (especially inflammatory conditions), I've found that a more balanced diet works best for maintenance once you've achieved optimal health. The key indicator I watch for is mucus production - if you're constantly dealing with phlegm or mucus issues, that's a clear signal something in your diet isn't working for you.

Alongside lithium orotate (I use the KAL brand purchased from a local health store, never Amazon), I also take NAC to support glutathione production. These supplements, combined with my training and fasting protocol, have been remarkably effective at keeping visceral fat at bay.

I should mention that last year I tried dry fasting once (no food or water) at the recommendation of Waters Above. It was possibly the most challenging thing I've ever done, largely because of my coffee addiction. While incredibly effective, I'm not planning to repeat it anytime soon - I'm just not ready to give up my daily coffee!

The results speak for themselves. I'm in better shape than guys half my age at the gym, and I've done it all drug-free. My approach isn't about vanity - though feeling confident in your physique is certainly a nice benefit. It's about optimizing health from the inside out by targeting the fat that actually threatens your longevity.

Check out the full video here.

Declaration of Military #Accountability: What You Can Verify

The Military Accountability Declaration: What You Need to Know

I've been looking into something significant that's not getting much mainstream attention - a document called the "Declaration of Military Accountability" dated January 4th, 2024, which you can find right on Congress.gov.

What struck me immediately about this document is that it's not some anonymous manifesto. Over 231 military officers put their actual names on this declaration, stating that certain military leadership has betrayed their oath of office. That's a serious claim with serious potential consequences for those making it.

When someone joins the military, they take a solemn oath to "support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic." This isn't just ceremonial - it's the bedrock principle that separates our military from those of authoritarian regimes. According to this declaration, led by figures including Ivan Rakelin, many high-ranking officers have failed to uphold this oath.

What I find particularly compelling is that many signatories are active duty officers, while others have been injured in service. These aren't armchair critics - these are people with skin in the game who've risked everything for their country.

There's also discussion about a purported declaration and summons from the Commander-in-Chief calling these military officers together. I want to be completely transparent with you - I don't have 100% verification this specific document is authentic. I understand Sheila Holm reportedly received it from active duty personnel, and there are claims from those with White House connections that it's legitimate. But without seeing definitive proof myself, I can only report what's being said.

When I talk about "restoring the republic," I'm not referencing fringe theories. I'm talking about returning to fundamental constitutional principles - government for the people, by the people. The simple yet profound concepts in our Constitution, especially those first ten amendments, that established our nation's foundation.

The most important takeaway is that the original declaration on Congress.gov is absolutely real and verifiable. You can look it up yourself, see the signatures, and even find interviews with some of the signatories online.

In these divisive times, I believe our path forward requires unity regardless of political party, race, or gender. We need to come together around our shared values and founding principles. This declaration represents military officers taking a stand for those principles - and that's something worth paying attention to, regardless of your political leanings.

Check out the full video here.

Craig Wright vs Satoshi: The #Bitcoin Wallet Mystery Unfolding

The $8.6 Billion Bitcoin Movement: What's Really Happening Before October 5th

I've been deep in the rabbit hole of what might be the most significant event in Bitcoin's history, and I want to share my findings with you. On July 4th, 2025 (American Independence Day), something extraordinary happened: $8.6 billion worth of Bitcoin was simultaneously moved from eight wallets that had been dormant for over 14 years.

This wasn't just any random transaction. Each wallet contained exactly 10,000 BTC in perfect symmetry, and all were moved with surgical precision in what appears to be a carefully orchestrated demonstration. What makes this even more fascinating is the legal notice inscribed directly on the blockchain, giving the original owner 90 days (until October 5th) to come forward before the funds are considered abandoned.

When I first saw this news, I immediately recognized the connection to the Kleiman v. Wright case. For those unfamiliar, this was a massive five-year legal battle that essentially established Craig Wright's control over Satoshi's wallets as a matter of law. Despite what some might claim, Wright didn't "lose" this case – he paid a relatively small fraction ($150 million) of the estimated $60 billion fortune, with the court acknowledging his control over these assets.

What we're witnessing now appears to be one of two possibilities: either Craig Wright himself is orchestrating this as part of a larger plan involving Bitcoin SV (BSV), or someone has somehow obtained the keys to these wallets. Based on everything I've studied, including Wright's continued public presence and ongoing activities, I believe the former is far more likely.

The legal strategy here is particularly fascinating. The entity behind this movement is applying adverse possession principles – concepts traditionally used for real estate – to the digital world of cryptocurrency. In essence, they're saying: "I've taken possession of abandoned digital property, made it public, offered a contestation period, and without objection, I'll become the legitimate owner."

What strikes me most about this operation is its meticulous execution. The blockchain messages contain references to the TV show "Lost" (the famous numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42), suggesting this is as much a conceptual performance as it is a financial move. There's an artistic element to this demonstration of cryptographic power.

The big question remains: what happens on October 5th? If the announced sale takes place, we could see significant market impact. But what if, instead of converting to fiat, these funds move to BSV? Wright himself recently stated, "Bitcoin doesn't fork, it scales" and "the original Bitcoin chain is called BSV." Could this be foreshadowing his intentions?

I believe we're witnessing a sophisticated play to not only claim abandoned wallets but potentially reshape the narrative around which chain represents Satoshi's original vision. By following proper legal procedures and giving due process, whoever is behind this movement is positioning themselves to withstand the inevitable scrutiny that will come with liquidating billions in cryptocurrency.

This October 5th date will undoubtedly mark a turning point for Bitcoin. Whether you believe Craig Wright is Satoshi or not, the legal and financial implications of this movement are impossible to ignore. I'll be watching closely as we approach this deadline, and I encourage you to stay informed about what could be a watershed moment in cryptocurrency history.

Check out the full video here.

Satoshi's $10 Billion #Bitcoin Move: October 5th Warning Explained

Uncovering the Satoshi Bitcoin Mystery: October 5th Deadline Approaches

I've been following the Satoshi Bitcoin wallet situation closely, and I have to say, things are getting incredibly interesting as we approach October 5th. If you haven't been keeping up with this saga, let me catch you up on what could be one of the most significant events in Bitcoin history.

Back in July, we witnessed something extraordinary: approximately $9-10 billion worth of Bitcoin from wallets believed to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto (Bitcoin's mysterious creator) was moved to exchanges. This wasn't just a simple transfer; messages were left on the blockchain indicating these funds might be liquidated on October 5th.

What fascinates me most about this situation is the careful legal process being followed. A notice was placed directly on the blockchain giving a 90-day window for anyone with legitimate claim to these coins to come forward, either by signing the wallet addresses or contacting the specified law firm. This is essentially due process in action within the crypto world.

I recently had a thought-provoking conversation with Dimmitri about the ethics of claiming potentially abandoned coins. Think about it this way: if you found a key fob containing Bitcoin keys, what would be the responsible thing to do? You can't just take them to the police or FBI. The most ethical approach would be to announce your finding and give the rightful owner a chance to claim them, which is exactly what's happening here on a much larger scale.

From my analysis, there are really only two possibilities here: either Craig Wright (who has claimed to be Satoshi and has been involved in legal cases regarding these addresses) controls these wallets, or someone else has obtained the keys and is going through proper legal procedures to establish ownership.

What we're witnessing might effectively be the "death" of Satoshi as a persona. If the real Satoshi doesn't come forward by October 5th to sign these messages, it essentially confirms they're either gone or unable to access their keys. The crypto world will never be the same.

I'm particularly excited about exploring this topic further with my audience. I've recently partnered with Lex, an original Bitcoin expert who previously worked with Twitch and Orange Gateway, to help elevate my channel's content. Together, we'll be diving deeper into stories like this one.

This October 5th deadline represents a fascinating intersection of cryptocurrency, law, and the enduring mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto. The outcome could have significant implications for Bitcoin's narrative and possibly even its market.

Check out the full video here.

BREAKING: Trump's Secret Military Summons Exposed 800 #Generals

Unverified: A "Declaration of Authority and Summons" document claims to require all flag officers to reaffirm allegiance to the constitutional republic. #MilitaryLeadership

https://youtu.be/KqWtnUFD7oc?si=5pz7ayH0YOTHX9ZX via @YouTube

CFTC vs SEC: How the Clarity Act Creates a #Bitcoin Advantage

The Clarity Act's "Mature Blockchain" Standard Could Change Everything

I've been diving deep into cryptocurrency legislation lately, and I've discovered something that could completely reshape the entire digital asset landscape. The Clarity Act, which hasn't passed yet but is making its way through Congress, contains a concept called "mature blockchain" that most crypto enthusiasts are completely overlooking.

Let me break down why this matters so much. While the Genius Act (sometimes I mistakenly call it Genesis Act because I'm thinking about Bitcoin) has already passed and covers stablecoin regulation, the Clarity Act goes much further by creating a critical distinction between cryptocurrencies that qualify as commodities versus those classified as securities.

What makes a "mature blockchain" according to this proposed legislation? The criteria are surprisingly specific:

• It can't be controlled or started by a single group of people
• Its value must come from widespread use and adoption rather than pure speculation
• It must not discriminate among users, ensuring open access for all
• Ownership concentration is capped at 20% of outstanding digital assets

When you start applying these criteria, something fascinating happens – almost every cryptocurrency fails the test. Pre-mined tokens? That's ownership concentration. Founded by an identifiable person or team? That violates the first criterion. Ethereum, XRP, Solana, Stellar, even BTC – none of them seem to qualify under a strict reading of these standards.

That leaves potentially only one blockchain standing: the original Bitcoin protocol as described in Satoshi's white paper.

Here's where it gets really interesting. If you qualify as a "mature blockchain," you fall under CFTC jurisdiction as a commodity rather than SEC oversight as a security. This distinction brings huge advantages, including exemptions from certain securities laws that are extremely complex and expensive to navigate.

I'm not saying other cryptocurrencies are illegal or worthless – they simply would have to comply with securities regulations, which is a whole different ballgame than commodity oversight. It's much more restrictive, more expensive, and requires working through licensed brokers and securities offerings.

Coincidentally (or perhaps not), Teranode just released on the Bitcoin testnet, enabling the scaling capacity needed for global adoption. The timing couldn't be more perfect – technological readiness aligning with regulatory clarity.

What really sealed this theory for me was learning that Brian Dohy, the Bitcoin Association lobbyist, met with Bo Hines (one of the Clarity Act's architects) before the bill was drafted. Shortly after, the initial version of the Clarity Act appeared with links to Satoshi interviews and Coingeek articles. While Bo has since left Congress (possibly for a position at Tether), his contribution to defining "mature blockchain" could prove pivotal.

I'm excited to explore this further at the upcoming hackathon in Oregon. We're taking an RV trip up there on the 9th, and I'm looking forward to connecting with others who understand what's happening with Bitcoin right now. The world is changing rapidly – from regulation to technology to governance – and understanding these shifts gives us a glimpse into what's coming next.

What do you think? Does this "mature blockchain" standard make sense to you? And more importantly, which projects do you think might actually qualify?

Check out the full video here.

XRP vs Original #Bitcoin: What Teranode Means for the Future

Why Teranode's Release Matters More Than XRP Speculation

I received a message from my buddy Jason the other day asking about XRP and whether it's going to be part of some "quantum financial system" everyone seems to be talking about online. This got me thinking about the stark difference between marketing hype and actual technological advancement in the cryptocurrency space.

Let's be honest – XRP has some of the best marketing in crypto. They've been at it since around 2014, and they've done an amazing job creating a narrative. But when you look under the hood and ask the hard questions about scalability, security, and whether it's a true proof-of-work system with skin in the game, the answers are disappointing.

While you might make some money speculating on XRP (I'm not saying you won't), it's what I call "picking up pennies in front of a bulldozer." You might get a few coins, maybe even some valuable ones, but the risk of getting flattened is substantial.

What's really exciting – and what most people focused on XRP aren't even aware of – is that Teranode just released on the Bitcoin testnet. This is HUGE news that hardly anyone is talking about. Teranode enables the original Bitcoin protocol to scale to one million transactions per second. Not BTC, not an altcoin, but the original peer-to-peer electronic cash system Satoshi described in the white paper.

I recently demonstrated this to someone on my show. I got her phone number and texted her actual money – not some funny money or Federal Reserve notes, but real digital cash – instantly for pennies. That's what Bitcoin was always designed to do, and now with Teranode, it can do it at global scale.

I've made mistakes in this space before. Back in 2015, I thought I'd "missed Bitcoin" and ended up investing in some altcoin scam from the Philippines that promised to be "better than Bitcoin." It was all hype, no substance, and eventually collapsed with people going to jail. That experience taught me to look beyond marketing and focus on utility, adoption, scalability, and proof-of-work.

That's why I'm heading to the Babage Hackathon in Oregon next month and planning a trip to London after that. The future is being built on the original Bitcoin protocol – a true ledger system that can serve as global money.

As for this "quantum financial system" theory – I have to ask, where's the evidence? I can't find a single piece of legislation about it. Meanwhile, there are actual laws being developed like the Clarity Act and the Genesis Act that define what constitutes a "mature blockchain." These are real, verifiable developments you can research yourself.

When you read these bills, you'll find that a mature blockchain can't have a central point of origin – it can't just be created by one person or entity. That disqualifies most cryptocurrencies right off the bat. The only truly mature blockchain by these definitions would be Satoshi's original Bitcoin.

So while everyone's distracted by XRP marketing and unverifiable claims about quantum financial systems, the real revolution is happening quietly with developments like Teranode. This is what will actually change the world – not hype, but functioning technology that delivers on the original promise of peer-to-peer electronic cash.

Check out the full video here.

First #DeepState #Indictment: FBI Director Comey Faces #Justice

Virginia grand jury indicts former FBI Director James @Comey for perjury related to congressional testimony. Several witnesses reportedly confirmed they took orders from him.

https://youtu.be/pS0GPujOxTU?si=f0d6klEwgagbLbue via @YouTube

Bitcoin and AI Fusion: October #Hackathon You Can't Miss

Why I'm Road-Tripping to Oregon for the Bitcoin Hackathon

I've got something exciting to share with you guys today. I'm heading up to Medford, Oregon next month for what might be one of the most important Bitcoin events of the year - and no, it's not about price predictions or trading strategies.

This is about something much more fundamental: the actual building happening on the Bitcoin protocol. The hackathon taking place on October 10-11 brings together some of the brightest minds in blockchain development, the people who are creating the infrastructure for the next generation of applications.

Here's what fascinates me: there's a striking parallel between what's happening now with Bitcoin development and what happened with AI before it exploded into the mainstream. Just as there were only a handful of people who truly understood how to build large language models before ChatGPT took over the world, there are currently only a small number of developers who genuinely understand how to build on the Bitcoin protocol.

And that talent is incredibly valuable. I mentioned in my video that there's supposedly a billion-dollar bounty from Meta for top AI developers. While I can't verify that claim, what I do know is that specialized technical skills eventually command premium prices. The same will likely happen for Bitcoin protocol developers, possibly sooner than we think.

But here's what I appreciate most about this event: it's not promising overnight riches. In a space full of hype and get-rich-quick schemes, this hackathon is focused on building something legitimate and lasting. It's about creating applications with integrity on a protocol designed for transparency.

I'm making this journey in style too! My buddy Mike is driving up in his professional-grade RV from San Francisco. We're turning it into a road trip with cards, podcasts, and plenty of Bitcoin talk along the way. If you're in the Bay Area and interested in joining us, reach out!

For those considering attending, expect cash prizes, job opportunities, and invaluable connections with the people who understand this technology at its deepest level. Whether you're a developer, entrepreneur, or just curious about the future of blockchain technology, this event offers a glimpse into what's coming.

So mark your calendars for October 10-11 in Medford, Oregon. This isn't just another crypto event - it's a gathering of people building the transparent ledger infrastructure that could transform how our digital world operates.

Check out the full video here.

ICE Unmasked: The #GreatAwakening in California Politics

"The state of California has no jurisdiction over the federal government." Federal agents stand firm against @CAgovernor controversial mask ban. #IceUnmasked

https://youtu.be/rdQUpMwW6qM?si=52-oyv1AEfcD01nQ via @YouTube

Is Bitcoin Core actually Fork? #BTC Dev Makes Bold Claim

Bitcoin Core "Death" Announcement: What's Really Happening Inside BTC Development

Have you been following the drama unfolding in the Bitcoin development community? In my latest video, I dive into what might be one of the most significant internal conflicts in Bitcoin's recent history.

I was shocked when I saw Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dash Jr. tweet that "Bitcoin Core is dead." This wasn't just some random crypto influencer making bold claims for attention this is coming from inside the house, from one of the most recognized developers in the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The controversy centers around Bitcoin Core version 30, scheduled for release in October 2025. This update introduces changes to mempool policies and OP_RETURN limits that would allow more arbitrary data on the blockchain. Critics like Luke argue this will bloat the chain and potentially invite regulatory scrutiny, similar to what happened with Bitcoin SV.

Speaking of Bitcoin SV, I was fascinated to discover a single wallet holding approximately two million BSV coins over 11% of the entire network! Could this possibly be Satoshi? The timing of this discovery alongside the Core controversy raises some interesting questions.

What I found particularly interesting was Luke's repeated claims that Bitcoin Core itself is actually a fork of Satoshi's original Bitcoin. This challenges the narrative many Bitcoin maximalists have embraced for years and adds another layer to the already complex debate about what constitutes "real Bitcoin."

I also questioned the common advice to "run your own node" by looking at the original Bitcoin whitepaper's definition of nodes. According to Satoshi's document, nodes must actually create blocks if you're not creating blocks, you're not really a node in the original sense.

This internal conflict appears to have been brewing for some time, with figures like Bruce Louu (formerly Shiae Louu) at sCrypt pushing for additional OP codes on Bitcoin Core. The philosophical divide seems to be about Bitcoin's fundamental identity: is it primarily a money network, or should it be a more versatile data platform?

What we're witnessing might be a pivotal moment in Bitcoin's evolution, with potential implications for its governance, technical direction, and regulatory standing. The passionate disagreements among core developers reflect just how much is at stake.

Check out the full video here to get all the details and form your own opinion on this unfolding situation.

OCTOBER SURPRISE: 80,000 Satoshi Bitcoins Set for $8 Billion Sell-Off

The October Bitcoin Bombshell: 80,000 Satoshi-Era BTC and the Short Opportunity of 2025

A Historic Crypto Event in the Making

The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with speculation as we approach what could be one of the most significant market events in Bitcoin's history. Approximately 80,000 BTC – worth roughly $8 billion at current prices – appears poised to hit the market in early October. These aren't just any bitcoins; they're believed to be from the Satoshi era, some of the earliest coins ever mined.

For traders and investors, this looming sell-off represents a potential short opportunity of unprecedented scale. But to understand why this matters, we need to dive into the fascinating backstory that combines legal maneuvering, blockchain forensics, and one of crypto's most controversial figures.

The 80,000 BTC Movement: What We Know

Earlier this year, on July 4th (American Independence Day), approximately 80,000 BTC moved across eight separate transactions. Each transaction contained a message linking to the "Solomon Brothers," presumably a law firm, providing notice that anyone claiming ownership of these coins should come forward with cryptographic proof within 90 days. If no one successfully claims them by early October, the current possessor will assert legal ownership.

The timing was clearly deliberate – July 4th symbolizing independence, with the 90-day period expiring just before the 15th anniversary of the Bitcoin whitepaper (October 31st). This level of symbolic planning suggests someone deeply connected to Bitcoin's history.

The Craig Wright Connection

This movement appears connected to the ongoing saga of Craig Wright, the Australian computer scientist who has claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto but was legally prohibited from making that assertion after losing a court case.

What makes this particularly interesting is a theory emerging from the crypto community: this could be a calculated legal maneuver by Wright to separate his identity from Satoshi while still claiming the coins. As one commentator named Binary recently posted, "Craig Wright is not Satoshi. He killed off Satoshi."

The theory suggests Wright is creating a legal distinction where his "Craig Wright persona" can take possession of "Satoshi's coins" without violating the court order preventing him from claiming to be Satoshi. It's a fascinating legal chess move if true.

Blockchain Forensics and Digital Graffiti

What lends credibility to the Wright connection is the sophisticated "blockchain graffiti" found within these transactions. References to "CSW" (Craig Wright's initials) and other encoded messages suggest the mover is highly knowledgeable about Bitcoin's early history and likely a "first generation Bitcoiner" – significantly narrowing the list of potential candidates.

This level of blockchain sophistication isn't something a random actor could easily accomplish. Whoever moved these coins has both the technical knowledge and the actual private keys necessary to access these dormant wallets.

The Legal Precedent Question

One of the most intriguing aspects of this situation is the legal maneuver being attempted. Can someone really claim "abandoned" digital assets simply by posting a notice? The concept appears to borrow from adverse possession in real estate law, where abandoned property can be claimed after a public notice period.

However, the application of this principle to digital assets represents uncharted legal territory. Cryptocurrency exists in a regulatory gray area in many jurisdictions, and this case could potentially establish new precedent for how dormant digital assets are treated.

The October Trading Event

For traders, the most immediately relevant aspect is what happens when the 90-day notice period expires in early October. If these 80,000 BTC are indeed sold, the market impact could be substantial.

A sudden $8 billion sell order would likely create significant downward pressure on Bitcoin's price, potentially triggering a cascade of liquidations and further price declines. This creates what many traders see as the perfect setup for a short position.

Some key considerations for traders:

1. Timing: The 90-day period from July 4th expires in early October (likely October 2-4).

2. Market preparation: Major market participants are likely already positioning themselves.

3. Front-running opportunity: Rather than waiting for the actual sell-off, positioning before the event could capture the anticipatory market movement.

4. Risk management: As with any major trading event, proper stop losses and position sizing are crucial.

Beyond the Trade: Historical Significance

While the trading opportunity is substantial, it's worth acknowledging the historical significance of this moment. If these truly are Satoshi-era coins, their movement represents a pivotal chapter in Bitcoin's evolving story.

The original Satoshi coins have remained dormant for so long that many considered them permanently removed from circulation – essentially "lost coins" that would never move. Their activation and potential sale rewrites that assumption and could permanently alter market dynamics.

Conclusion: Preparing for the Bitcoin Earthquake

Whether you're a trader looking to capitalize on this potential market move or simply a cryptocurrency enthusiast watching history unfold, the October deadline represents a significant moment in Bitcoin's timeline.

For traders, now is the time to develop a strategy. Will you position for the short opportunity? How will you manage risk if the market moves against expectations? And perhaps most importantly – what happens if Satoshi (or someone with legitimate claim to these coins) actually does come forward before the deadline?

As one of the speakers in our discussion noted, "It's going to be a documentary... it's not over yet." Indeed, we are witnessing cryptocurrency history unfold in real-time, with potentially billions of dollars at stake.

The clock is ticking toward early October. Are you ready for Bitcoin's next seismic shift?

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Cryptocurrency trading involves significant risk, and you should never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Muscle Building Without Dieting: 2000% Natural HGH Increase

'I hate dieting.' How to stay lean while eating until satisfaction. The key? Meal timing, not meal restriction.

#IntermittentFasting

https://youtu.be/Nm0pLRe1p3M?si=pUtDZFzSobickUpp via @YouTube

Satoshi Coins, Hyper-Bitcoinization and Bitcoin's Uncensored Social Medi...

Beyond the Narrative: Bitcoin, Free Speech, and the Future of Social Media

In a wide-ranging conversation spanning over 90 minutes, Dmitriy Fabrikant (creator of Tree Chat) and Gavin Mehl explored topics that sit at the intersection of technology, media, constitutional rights, and the future of Bitcoin. Their discussion offers valuable insights for anyone interested in how blockchain technology might reshape our digital landscape.

Media Skepticism in an Era of Distrust

The conversation began with reflections on mainstream narratives, particularly around recent events like the Charlie Kirk situation. Both speakers emphasized a healthy skepticism toward institutional messaging.

"We're just in a situation where there's like zero trust," Dmitriy observed. "You can name the authority—the medical authority, the justice system, the politicians—there's just so little institutional trust that almost no matter what they say, you have to be skeptical because we've just been lied to over and over again."

This skepticism extends to visual media as well. In an age of deepfakes and AI-generated content, both agreed that blockchain technology could eventually provide solutions by timestamping and verifying the provenance of videos and images—creating an immutable record of when and where media was created.

First Amendment Maximalism

Perhaps the most passionate segment of the conversation centered on free speech principles. Using the example of a Texas university student who was arrested after making offensive comments about Charlie Kirk, both speakers defended broad First Amendment protections.

"For those who aren't familiar with the laws, fortunately for the First Amendment, people have the right to say what they want even if it's despicable, absolutely rude, hateful, and just mean," Gavin emphasized.

Dmitriy agreed, adding: "It's not about her—it's about the standard that you're setting so that you can speak out when more important issues come up... I'm a First Amendment maximalist, fundamentalist. I really don't care who you are or what political party you're in."

Their defense of speech rights—even speech they find objectionable—sets the stage for their discussion of censorship-resistant social media.

Tree Chat: Reimagining Social Media

The core of the conversation focused on Tree Chat, Dmitriy's platform built on Bitcoin SV. Unlike conventional social media platforms, Tree Chat operates without advertising, instead using microtransactions to monetize content and fund operations.

"By having microtransactions and being able to post and earn money, and Tree Chat takes a small fraction of that to monetize, we don't have to do ads," Dmitriy explained. "We're going to have a social media that is ad-free, doesn't harvest your attention, doesn't do rage-bait, doesn't collect your data, and doesn't censor on anyone's behalf—including advertisers, because there are none."

This model addresses what both speakers identify as a fundamental problem with current platforms: "You're not in control of your attention on these other networks... You're literally trading your attention, something valuable, to be able to use these networks."

BSV vs. Solana: Technical and Philosophical Differences

When Gavin asked why Dmitriy chose to build on Bitcoin SV rather than more popular blockchains like Solana, the answer revealed both technical and philosophical considerations.

On the technical side, Dmitriy cited superior scaling capabilities and significantly lower fees: "I can send like 1/1000th of a cent in Tree Chat. Some people are sending like 10 Satoshis, which is just tiny amounts of money. We want the friction of money moving to be very low."

These nano-transactions enable not just content monetization but also on-chain storage of all posts: "You're creating an on-chain record of what people care about, what people are reading, what's happening in the world. It's almost like a historical archive created through the use of this social media."

Philosophically, Dmitriy emphasized Bitcoin's original vision of a fixed protocol without centralized control: "There's a corporation behind Solana... someone can lean on them, influence them. The whole original idea of a fixed protocol, of Bitcoin as a commodity—that's a very appealing idea to me."

The Mystery of Satoshi's Coins

The conversation took an intriguing turn when discussing recent movements of 80,000 BTC, allegedly from Satoshi-era wallets. These coins moved with a message offering a 90-day notice period for anyone claiming ownership, after which the current possessor would take legal possession.

Gavin proposed a theory involving Craig Wright: "What's happening is it's separating Satoshi and Craig Wright once and for all... It's going through 100% legal process to give the world notice."

While Dmitriy found the theory plausible, he remained skeptical about the legal precedent: "I'm not sold on the idea that just by announcing that, they get all these legal rights... I'm unconvinced that if Satoshi doesn't sign, then this other person gets the money."

This discussion highlighted the evolving nature of legal frameworks around cryptocurrency ownership—an area still developing as blockchain technology matures.

The Future: Hyper-Bitcoinization

Looking ahead to 2030, both speakers explored the concept of "hyper-bitcoinization"—the rapid adoption of Bitcoin that could fundamentally reshape the global financial system.

Dmitriy noted that Bitcoin SV's shared hash algorithm with BTC creates unique dynamics: "If Bitcoin SV succeeds, there's all this hash power sitting on a competing network that, if Bitcoin SV can prove itself, will just immediately flow into BSV."

He also drew parallels to historical transitions: "I was born in the Soviet Union... that happened extremely fast relatively speaking in terms of geopolitics. You can imagine people coming to the realization that the fiat order is doomed and also unjust."

The key advantage of BSV, in Dmitriy's view, is eliminating the hierarchy of money: "What BSV does is give you that reserve asset and then actually lets you transact in it... You have the reserve asset and you can extremely almost for free send it around, and that's a huge deal."

Hands-On Tutorial

The conversation concluded with a detailed Tree Chat tutorial, with Dmitriy guiding Gavin through posting content, connecting to X/Twitter, managing threads, and using AI image generation features.

This practical demonstration showcased Tree Chat's capabilities, from creating threaded content to generating AI images and videos—all monetizable through BSV micropayments.

Conclusion: Building the Future

Throughout their conversation, both speakers emphasized the importance of creating compelling applications rather than focusing on cryptocurrency prices. As Dmitriy put it: "If you offer a compelling product that can only be had on the Bitcoin network, then no one will care [about the underlying technology]."

This pragmatic approach—building useful tools that leverage blockchain's unique capabilities—may ultimately determine whether Bitcoin fulfills its revolutionary potential. By focusing on real-world utility like censorship-resistance, data ownership, and frictionless micropayments, platforms like Tree Chat are showing what's possible when we move beyond speculation to practical application.

For those interested in the future of social media, free speech, and Bitcoin's original vision, this conversation provides a thought-provoking roadmap of what might lie ahead.

Scaling Bitcoin to Infinity: Inside Teranode with Siggy and Kurt #Bitcoi...

The Scaling Revolution: How Teranode Will Transform Bitcoin's Future

For years, the blockchain space has been locked in fierce debates about how to scale cryptocurrency networks. While most projects have pursued complex Layer 2 solutions or completely different consensus mechanisms, one team has been quietly rebuilding Bitcoin's original protocol from the ground up to achieve something many thought impossible: scaling the base layer itself to handle millions of transactions per second.

I recently hosted a conversation with two key figures leading this effort: Siggy, who heads development of the Teranode Bitcoin implementation, and Kurt Walker Jr. from Gorilla Pool mining operation. What they revealed about the current state of Bitcoin scaling left me more convinced than ever that we're witnessing a fundamental transformation in what's possible with blockchain technology.

The Orchestra vs. The Solo Guitarist

Siggy used a powerful analogy that helps explain what makes Teranode different from current Bitcoin node implementations:

"What we're actually doing now -- you could look at SV node and BTC Core as a guy on stage with an acoustic guitar singing. It's a solo guy, a singer-songwriter singing his song. What we're trying to do is create an orchestra, and getting an orchestra in tune and playing together is a lot harder than being alone on stage with a guitar."

This orchestra approach is what allows Teranode to process transactions at a scale that would be impossible with current implementations. Instead of a monolithic application, Teranode uses a microservices architecture where different components can be optimized, replaced, and scaled independently.

From Testing to Reality

What's remarkable is that this isn't just theoretical. Teranode is already processing blocks on the Bitcoin network:

"TAL is now mining with half their hash power on Teranode," Siggy explained. "They mined a 3GB block last week, which was actually a surprise to us, but fantastic. They're out there trailblazing."

In testing environments, the results are even more impressive. Siggy shared that he was "pumping 350 TPS from my laptop into my Teranode" which then propagated to a dozen other nodes without issue. This casual test on consumer hardware is already 50 times what the current implementation handles, and they've previously demonstrated 1 million TPS in controlled environments.

Real-World Applications Finally Possible

Kurt Walker Jr. explained why this matters using an internet analogy:

"I remember when I finally was able to get broadband internet for the very first time and start doing things like video chats or sending big files... When we got broadband internet, all of a sudden we had this 50x or 100x improvement. That was when stuff started to hockey stick and people really started to say, 'Hey, we can create interfaces that make it easy for people to interact with the network.'"

Both speakers emphasized that the most exciting applications probably haven't even been conceived yet. Just as few predicted Uber or Instagram when broadband internet first emerged, the applications that will define Bitcoin's future will be built by entrepreneurs seeing opportunities nobody else recognized.

A Different Approach to Blockchain Design

One of the most interesting aspects of the conversation was Siggy's explanation of why Bitcoin's original design is fundamentally superior for scaling:

"A lot of people playing in the blockchain space are trying to perfect and improve on Bitcoin's design. They're saying Bitcoin script isn't rich enough, so they add Rust-based smart contracts or EVM. I think they're completely missing the point. Bitcoin is simple by design. It doesn't have loops on purpose because that makes it unpredictable and non-deterministic. Everything in Bitcoin's design is there for scalability."

This perspective challenges the conventional wisdom that has guided blockchain development for years. Rather than adding complexity, Teranode's approach embraces Bitcoin's original simplicity while reimagining how the software implements it.

The Road Ahead

While the technology is progressing rapidly, both speakers acknowledged the challenges of adoption. They discussed the need for building practical applications that demonstrate value to users who don't care about blockchain technology itself.

"We're in the innovator stage," Gavin noted. "We're not even at early adoption yet."

Siggy advised patience: "Don't expect it's going to come quickly. It's not going to all of a sudden jump in the next couple of months when Teranode is released. Probably nothing's going to happen because not enough people are paying attention. But they will if we keep going."

Conclusion

The scaling breakthrough represented by Teranode could fundamentally change what's possible with blockchain technology. By focusing on the original Bitcoin protocol and reimagining its implementation, these developers are creating infrastructure that could support global-scale applications while maintaining the security and decentralization that make blockchain valuable.

Whether this approach ultimately succeeds will depend not just on technical execution but on whether developers and entrepreneurs can build compelling applications that leverage this new capacity. But one thing is clear: the potential of Bitcoin's original design is far greater than most people realize, and we're just beginning to see what's possible when it's allowed to scale as intended.

What the Legacy System REALLY Fears About #Bitcoin Protocol

Blog Post

How Bitcoin's Scaling Solution Threatens the Entire Financial System

I've been thinking a lot lately about what truly scares the legacy financial system. After years in this space, I've come to a simple conclusion: what they fear most is you and I transacting directly with each other, cutting them out entirely.

That's the revolutionary power of the Bitcoin protocol. Not as a speculative investment, not as "digital gold," but as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system that allows direct value transfer without intermediaries taking their cut at every step.

Tomorrow, I'm hosting a conversation that I'm incredibly excited about. I'll be speaking with Siggy, the man who's leading the effort to scale the entire Bitcoin network globally through what's called Teranote. This isn't some side chain or layer 2 solution—this is scaling Bitcoin's node software at the foundational layer (what I call "layer zero") to enable unlimited on-chain transactions.

Right now, we're at what adoption theorists call the "innovator stage." We're not even at early adoption yet. We're the pioneers, the people who see the potential before it becomes obvious to everyone else. Having even a small amount of knowledge about this technology puts you ahead of 99% of the population.

What's particularly important to understand is that this isn't a company or a business opportunity. Teranote is developed by an association of members who have come together with a shared vision: to build and secure Bitcoin for the long term, creating a legacy that will benefit our children and future generations.

The legacy financial system has spent decades inserting itself between every transaction. They take fees for transfers, they monetize our data, they control who can participate. The Bitcoin protocol fundamentally threatens this model by enabling direct peer-to-peer transactions on a massive scale.

When Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin, the vision wasn't for a new speculative asset class—it was for a new financial system that empowers individuals. With Teranote scaling the network, we're finally getting closer to realizing that original vision.

If you want to understand how this scaling solution works and what it means for the future of finance, tune in to my conversation with Siggy tomorrow on X (formerly Twitter). I'll try to get it on YouTube as well for those who prefer that platform.

This is about more than just technology—it's about creating a more equitable financial system that works for everyone, not just the privileged few. It's about building something that lasts, something our children can inherit, something that preserves the core values of financial sovereignty and direct exchange.

Check out the full video here.

Upcoming #Bitcoin Events and Why the Regulation Matters

How MyCardShares' Paper May Have Shaped Bitcoin's Regulatory Future

Today I want to share something incredibly significant that I believe most people in the Bitcoin space have completely missed. It concerns regulation, the future classification of digital assets, and a paper that may have quietly influenced the upcoming Clarity Act.

About eight months ago, Brian Dougherty's and MyCardShares submitted an 11-page white paper to the SEC. This wasn't just another company begging for favorable treatment. Instead, it provided a comprehensive legal framework explaining why the original Bitcoin protocol should be classified as a digital commodity rather than a security.

What struck me when reading this paper was how it seemed to directly preempt the Clarity Act, which wasn't drafted until months later. The similarities between the arguments in the MyCardShares paper and the provisions in the Clarity Act draft are unmistakable.

The paper outlines five essential elements that define a mature blockchain as a digital commodity: it must have a neutral point of organic growth, no single founder or originator who issued all tokens, must use proof-of-work (not proof-of-stake), and must meet specific legal definitions that classify it as property.

What's fascinating is that when you apply these criteria, you quickly realize there's really only one blockchain that fully satisfies all these requirements. The paper makes a compelling comparison to real estate investment trusts (REITs), arguing that investing in the Bitcoin protocol is similar to investing in property—it's a commodity, not a security.

This distinction is crucial for Bitcoin's future. If classified as a commodity, Bitcoin would face much less restrictive regulation than if it were deemed a security. This would allow for broader adoption and use as the peer-to-peer cash system it was designed to be.

Beyond the regulatory implications, I'm incredibly excited about Bitcoin's potential to create a new financial system based on cash transactions. Not through trading crypto as most people think about it today, but through simple, direct peer-to-peer exchanges. There's something beautiful about cash—it's immediate, it's private, and it's efficient. Digital cash on the original Bitcoin protocol offers these same benefits, but with global reach.

I'm diving deeper into all aspects of Bitcoin in the coming months. This Friday, I'm hosting an X Space with Siggy to discuss the scalable Bitcoin network, with Kurt Walker Jr. joining to talk about Terra Node and mining. I'll also be attending the Babage Hackathon in Oregon and a blockchain conference in London.

Despite the FUD being spread by what I call the "small blockers" who focus solely on price appreciation, I remain convinced that Bitcoin's true value lies in its utility as digital cash and its ability to preserve our data on an immutable ledger. This is how we take back digital sovereignty in an increasingly centralized world.

If you're interested in where Bitcoin is headed from a regulatory perspective, I highly recommend checking out the Brian Dougherty's paper. It provides a clear roadmap for how Bitcoin might be classified under future regulations, and possibly even influenced the direction of the Clarity Act itself.

Check out the full video here.

Why Standing On Active #Freeway Lanes Is Never A Good Idea

Why Standing On Active #Freeway Lanes Is Never A Good Idea https://youtu.be/EUbJ07OcXMU?si=YgbvUbVrksj8_TJP via @YouTube

Why Elites Fear #Bitcoin: Preserving Our Timeline Against Resets

How Bitcoin Preserves Our History Against Those Who Would Erase It

Today I want to share some thoughts that might challenge your perspective on Bitcoin and its true significance in human history. While most people understand Bitcoin as a form of digital money or an investment vehicle, I believe its most powerful function may be something entirely different: preserving our timeline against those who would manipulate it.

In my latest video, I dive into what I've discovered about historical patterns that seem to repeat approximately every 138 years. This isn't random conspiracy theorizing, but rather observations based on documented historical records compiled in works like The Chronicon. When you study these patterns, you begin to see something fascinating and disturbing: certain years seem to be "erased" from common historical knowledge.

Take 1902, for instance. If you look closely, you'll find that many historical records from major cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco from that year are mysteriously absent. Coincidentally, many major Fortune 100 companies were founded that same year. Is this merely coincidence, or evidence of something more calculated?

Drawing from my legal background, I emphasize the importance of understanding motive. In our justice system, proving "mens ria" (guilty mind or intent) is fundamental to establishing guilt. So what's the motive behind hiding certain historical patterns and events from the general public? My conclusion: control. By knowing when certain cyclical events will occur, elites can prepare while leaving the rest of us vulnerable.

This is where Bitcoin enters the picture. Beyond allowing us to transact freely without intermediaries, Bitcoin creates an immutable ledger, a permanent record that cannot be erased or manipulated. For the first time in human history, we have a way to preserve our timeline that cannot be controlled by any central authority.

I've been fooled before by mainstream narratives like Y2K and the 2012 Mayan calendar predictions. These experiences taught me to question official stories and dig deeper. What I've found has convinced me that Bitcoin's most revolutionary aspect isn't financial but historical: it's our defense against those who would manipulate time itself.

The next time someone dismisses Bitcoin as merely digital gold or a speculative asset, remember this deeper perspective. We're not just changing how money works; we're preserving our very history against those who would erase it.

Check out the full video here.

Inside Bitcoin Scaling: Siggi Oskarsson Reveals Teranode Vision || Gavin...

In the age of AI manipulation, what will be our source of truth? @___siggi___ on why scalable #blockchain is the only viable solution for digital verification.

MASSIVE!!!

https://youtu.be/gsIaWZrWFsg