Just returned from the London Blockchain Conference, and I can't stop thinking about the massive disconnect I witnessed. On one side, we have the veterans - people who've been in Bitcoin for years, exhausted and cynical. "It's dead," they say. "It's never going to work."
And then there are the newcomers - wide-eyed, energized, and seeing possibilities everywhere.
Both are missing something critical.
What struck me most wasn't about trading or price predictions. It was about consulting. Not everyone has capital, technical skills, or time - the usual entrepreneurship prerequisites. But right now, there's an enormous opportunity for anyone who can understand BRC 100 and Metanet well enough to explain their business applications.
I met teenagers skipping college to pursue this path. They're not becoming engineers - they're becoming consultants who can:
The key innovation enabling this is the vendor-neutral wallet infrastructure. Previously, when wallet services like Money Button shut down, users faced complex recovery processes. The BRC 100 standard solves this through interoperability - if one provider closes, your assets remain accessible through the standardized protocol.
We're essentially in 1992 internet years - the early Netscape browser days. Just as few people understood what "browsing the internet" meant then, we're at a similar stage with "browsing Bitcoin."
This won't make anyone rich overnight. But remember what followed the browser revolution? Two decades of exponential growth and opportunity.
For entrepreneurs looking to capitalize:
The most successful people won't be chasing quick gains on speculative tokens but building infrastructure and services for Bitcoin's next evolution phase.
Check out the full video here:
Hey everyone! I'm getting really excited about the upcoming London blockchain conference, and I wanted to share some thoughts about what's happening in the Bitcoin space right now and why this event is going to be so significant.
First off, if you're going to be in London or thinking about a last-minute trip, definitely check out blockchainacademy.info for all the event details. There are around 20 different events happening, and it's shaping up to be an incredible gathering of minds in the blockchain space.
One of the things I'm most excited about discussing at the conference is the current state of Bitcoin, particularly BSV and the Teranode network. What most people don't realize is that we're facing a serious supply crunch. With Teranode now live on mainnet and capable of processing a million transactions per second, the demand for Bitcoin as the gas that powers this network is growing rapidly, while the supply remains fixed at 21 million.
This is fundamentally different from speculative cryptocurrencies that lack real utility. I was just talking with my buddy Casey about how traders are getting absolutely wrecked trying to long and short these speculative markets. The reality is that the base layer Bitcoin protocol is what's solving real problems and creating real value.
I'm also looking forward to learning more about MNE (Money), the first gasless stablecoin, and diving deeper into why we need the BRC 100 protocol. One of my main questions for people like Jake Jones at Teranode is understanding the importance of having a universal protocol for Bitcoin going forward.
A major challenge we still need to overcome is the lack of payment rails for everyday Bitcoin transactions. Banks are blocking transactions and requiring unnecessary KYC processes, making mainstream adoption difficult. Until we solve this problem, we won't see the seamless integration of Bitcoin into daily life that we're all working toward.
On a personal note, I've upgraded my equipment for this trip with a new Sony vlogging camera and DJI audio system so I can capture professional interviews and content while I'm there. It's my first time using a real camera instead of just a phone, so it's a bit intimidating but exciting!
I'll be meeting up with a great group of people including Lex, L, Guido, Sebastian from Teranode, and about 28 others from our private Telegram group. I'm looking forward to sharing all these experiences with you through daily uploads during the conference.
Check out the full video here to get all the details about what's happening in London and my thoughts on the current state of Bitcoin and blockchain technology.
The mysterious origin story of Bitcoin is finally coming to the big screen in what promises to be a blockbuster conspiracy thriller. Doug Liman, director of action classics like "The Bourne Identity," "Mr. & Mrs. Smith," and "Edge of Tomorrow," has been tapped to direct "Killing Satoshi" - a film that dares to explore what might be "the greatest cover-up of our time."
According to the official announcement, "Killing Satoshi" will star Academy Award winner Casey Affleck and Pete Davidson in a story that explores not just who Bitcoin's creator might be, but why powerful global interests have "done everything in their power to make sure he nor it ever surfaces."
The press release describes a plot that weaves together "political intrigue and high-stakes tech espionage" in "a race against time as forces across the globe spanning governments, Wall Street, and Silicon Valley conspire to silence the truth."
What's particularly intriguing is that the film seems poised to explore the deeper conspiracy theories that have swirled around Satoshi Nakamoto for years. The official description asks: "What if he was real? What if someone tried to kill him and erase his identity forever, keeping him from ever making a comeback?"
As someone who has followed the Bitcoin story since its earliest days, I'm fascinated to see Hollywood tackle this subject matter - particularly with the talent attached to this project.
In other significant news I covered in today's video, we now have confirmation about that mysterious 80,000 BTC movement we've been tracking. Despite speculation that the seller might wait until October 4th, Galaxy Digital has confirmed they executed the sale on behalf of a single client by August.
This approximately $2.4 billion sale was one of the largest Bitcoin transactions in history, and it's noteworthy that the market absorbed this selling pressure relatively smoothly. The transactions included OP return messages that caused much speculation, but we now know they were part of this major liquidation event.
For those interested in connecting in person, I'll be attending the Bitcoin Experience conference in London from October 20-24. This happens to coincide with when "Killing Satoshi" will begin filming in London - a coincidence that hasn't escaped my notice.
If you're planning to attend, you can find registration details at blockchainacademy.info. The event isn't free - there's "proof of work" required as they put it - but I'm expecting around 25 people I know to be there. I'm considering providing media coverage of the event, so stay tuned for more details on that.
As I mentioned in the video, there's additional information about this topic that I'm contractually unable to share. While I've considered breaking that contract to bring you the full story, I've decided to honor my commitments for now.
That said, the announcement of "Killing Satoshi" suggests that much of what has remained hidden about Bitcoin's creator may soon come to light - not through leaks or speculation, but through a major Hollywood production that could reach millions of viewers worldwide.
Could this film finally expose "the greatest cover-up of our time"? We'll have to wait until 2026 to find out - but in the meantime, I'll continue bringing you all the Bitcoin news I'm legally able to share.
What do you think about this film announcement? Will Hollywood get the Satoshi story right? Let me know in the comments below.
In a significant development for the cryptocurrency community, Roger Ver - often called "Bitcoin Jesus" for his early evangelism of Bitcoin - has had his tax indictment dismissed after agreeing to pay nearly $50 million to the US government.
According to court documents I reviewed in today's video, Ver admitted to controlling approximately 130,664 bitcoins (worth about $73 million) when he renounced his US citizenship in 2014. US law requires citizens renouncing their citizenship to accurately report all assets on their tax returns, but Ver acknowledged that he failed to report all his Bitcoin holdings.
The government claimed this resulted in approximately $16 million in unpaid taxes. Critically, Ver admitted that his failure to report was "willful" - legally defined as "an intentional and voluntary violation of a known legal duty." This admission was key to the settlement.
In exchange for the dismissal of his indictment, Ver agreed to:
The court documents confirm that Ver has already paid this amount, leading to the government's motion to dismiss the indictment "without prejudice" (meaning charges could theoretically be refiled if Ver breaches other aspects of the agreement).
This case highlights several important issues:
The Long Arm of US Tax Law: Even years after renouncing citizenship, the US government pursued Ver for tax obligations related to his cryptocurrency holdings.
Cryptocurrency Reporting Requirements: The case serves as a stark reminder that cryptocurrency assets must be properly reported for tax purposes, especially during major life events like citizenship changes.
Potential Political Motivations: As I mentioned in my video, the timing of Ver's indictment raises questions. Ver was a key figure behind the Bitcoin Cash fork in 2017, championing "big block Bitcoin" in opposition to the direction taken by Bitcoin Core developers. Was this prosecution purely about taxes, or was there a political element?
Jurisdiction and Statute of Limitations: I expressed surprise that the government maintained jurisdiction given the time that had passed since 2014. The fact that Ver settled rather than challenging these aspects suggests the significant pressure he was under while detained in Spain.
Ver's case represents one of the highest-profile cryptocurrency tax settlements to date. It sends a clear message that the US government is serious about pursuing tax compliance in the cryptocurrency space, even against individuals who have left the country.
For early Bitcoin adopters who may have accumulated significant holdings before the regulatory landscape was clear, this case serves as a warning about the potential consequences of incomplete reporting.
While Ver has now resolved this case and can move forward as a "free man," the $50 million price tag for that freedom is a sobering reminder of the intersection between innovative technology and traditional tax systems.
What do you think about Ver's case and settlement? Was the government's pursuit justified, or was there more to the story? Let me know in the comments below.
The conversation around blockchain technology has reached a critical juncture. As governments worldwide push toward Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and surveillance capabilities expand, many are rightfully questioning whether blockchain itself might become the prophesied "beast system" of total control.
I recently watched a thoughtful discussion between Nino Rodriguez and Rob Cunningham addressing these concerns, and while they raised important points about zero knowledge proofs as a privacy solution, I believe they missed some fundamental distinctions that demand closer examination.
First, we need to recognize that not all blockchains are created equal. The difference between a truly decentralized, peer-to-peer system and a centralized blockchain with pre-mined tokens is the difference between financial liberation and sophisticated digital slavery.
Take XRP, for example, which was mentioned as potentially being "the internet of value." Before accepting such claims, we should ask critical questions: Was this cryptocurrency pre-mined? The answer is yes - founders like Jed McCaleb (who previously ran Mt. Gox before its infamous collapse) and others allocated massive portions to themselves before public distribution. This isn't decentralization; it's a new form of centralization with different controllers.
Can XRP actually scale to handle "the internet of value"? Would it need to process billions or even trillions of transactions daily? And if so, has this capability been demonstrated beyond marketing claims? These questions require technical examination beyond what most influencers provide.
The upcoming Clarity Act will likely differentiate between mature, decentralized blockchains (which would qualify as commodities) and centrally controlled tokens. A truly mature blockchain cannot have a central point of origin or pre-mined tokens - these features make it functionally similar to a central bank with different branding.
What many don't realize is that Satoshi Nakamoto's original Bitcoin design was specifically created to solve these problems. It established a truly peer-to-peer electronic cash system without pre-mining, without central control, and with the capacity to scale globally. This design has been preserved despite numerous attempts to alter or control it.
The patent landscape surrounding blockchain technology reveals much about the power structures at play. The formation of the COPA patent alliance and their aggressive actions against certain figures demonstrates how threatened established interests are by truly decentralized technology. These aren't actions taken against irrelevant systems; they're defensive measures against existential threats to centralized control.
So is blockchain the beast system? The technology itself is neutral, but implementation matters enormously. A centralized blockchain controlled by banks or pre-mined by insiders could indeed become part of a control system more sophisticated than anything previously possible. But a truly decentralized, peer-to-peer system with proper privacy protections represents the opposite - a path toward financial sovereignty.
I encourage everyone, especially influencers with large platforms like Rob, to go beyond surface-level research. Actually use these systems. Attend events where real development is happening. Meet the people building on these technologies. This Thursday, I'll be in Medford, Oregon judging the BSV Hackathon where developers are creating applications on the original Bitcoin protocol.
The stakes couldn't be higher. As we transition into a digital financial world, the distinction between true peer-to-peer systems and disguised central control will determine whether technology liberates or enslaves us. Choose wisely.
Check out the full video here.
I've been getting a lot of questions lately about my physique and how I maintain it, particularly from Sebastian who works with the Teranode group. He was curious about the lithium orotate supplement I've mentioned in previous videos, so I thought I'd share my complete approach to targeting visceral fat - the most dangerous type of fat in our bodies.
First, let me explain why visceral fat matters so much. Unlike the subcutaneous fat that sits just under your skin (which might affect your appearance but isn't necessarily harmful), visceral fat wraps around your internal organs like your heart and liver. This is the fat that's associated with inflammation, disease risk, and accelerated aging. You can look relatively lean and still have dangerous amounts of visceral fat.
I first learned about lithium orotate from Dr. Sean O'Meira when I was following the Warrior Diet. As someone who's naturally very hyperactive and high-energy, I started taking it primarily for its calming effects - it helps me stay focused, balanced, and less reactive to stressors. But what surprised me was noticing my physique tightening up without changing anything else about my routine.
My training approach is unconventional but incredibly effective. I only do high-intensity workouts approximately every six days (yes, just once a week), alternating between push and pull routines. I'm talking about one brutally intense set per exercise - heavy squats for 7-8 reps, incline press to failure, standing press, deadlifts, and so on. It's consolidated training inspired by Mike Mentzer with some band work I learned from John Jaquish.
The key distinction I want to emphasize is between aerobic and anaerobic activity. I do get my steps in every day - about 3.5-4 miles of walking - because that's what our bodies are designed to do. But I never jog or do traditional cardio. Instead, I do 1-3 sprint sessions weekly - 4-5 all-out 50-60 yard dashes or vertical jump training. This is pure anaerobic work that triggers completely different hormonal and metabolic responses than steady-state cardio.
Perhaps the most transformative aspect of my approach has been consistent intermittent fasting. For over 800 consecutive days, I haven't eaten anything before 5:00 PM. This is non-negotiable for me now. When your eating window is compressed like this, you gain incredible awareness about what you're consuming. I generally eat the same foods each day (with occasional exceptions for social meals), which removes decision fatigue and ensures I'm getting consistent nutrition.
I've experimented extensively with different diets, including strict carnivore/lion diet. While that approach can be incredible for addressing specific health issues (especially inflammatory conditions), I've found that a more balanced diet works best for maintenance once you've achieved optimal health. The key indicator I watch for is mucus production - if you're constantly dealing with phlegm or mucus issues, that's a clear signal something in your diet isn't working for you.
Alongside lithium orotate (I use the KAL brand purchased from a local health store, never Amazon), I also take NAC to support glutathione production. These supplements, combined with my training and fasting protocol, have been remarkably effective at keeping visceral fat at bay.
I should mention that last year I tried dry fasting once (no food or water) at the recommendation of Waters Above. It was possibly the most challenging thing I've ever done, largely because of my coffee addiction. While incredibly effective, I'm not planning to repeat it anytime soon - I'm just not ready to give up my daily coffee!
The results speak for themselves. I'm in better shape than guys half my age at the gym, and I've done it all drug-free. My approach isn't about vanity - though feeling confident in your physique is certainly a nice benefit. It's about optimizing health from the inside out by targeting the fat that actually threatens your longevity.
Check out the full video here.
I've been looking into something significant that's not getting much mainstream attention - a document called the "Declaration of Military Accountability" dated January 4th, 2024, which you can find right on Congress.gov.
What struck me immediately about this document is that it's not some anonymous manifesto. Over 231 military officers put their actual names on this declaration, stating that certain military leadership has betrayed their oath of office. That's a serious claim with serious potential consequences for those making it.
When someone joins the military, they take a solemn oath to "support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic." This isn't just ceremonial - it's the bedrock principle that separates our military from those of authoritarian regimes. According to this declaration, led by figures including Ivan Rakelin, many high-ranking officers have failed to uphold this oath.
What I find particularly compelling is that many signatories are active duty officers, while others have been injured in service. These aren't armchair critics - these are people with skin in the game who've risked everything for their country.
There's also discussion about a purported declaration and summons from the Commander-in-Chief calling these military officers together. I want to be completely transparent with you - I don't have 100% verification this specific document is authentic. I understand Sheila Holm reportedly received it from active duty personnel, and there are claims from those with White House connections that it's legitimate. But without seeing definitive proof myself, I can only report what's being said.
When I talk about "restoring the republic," I'm not referencing fringe theories. I'm talking about returning to fundamental constitutional principles - government for the people, by the people. The simple yet profound concepts in our Constitution, especially those first ten amendments, that established our nation's foundation.
The most important takeaway is that the original declaration on Congress.gov is absolutely real and verifiable. You can look it up yourself, see the signatures, and even find interviews with some of the signatories online.
In these divisive times, I believe our path forward requires unity regardless of political party, race, or gender. We need to come together around our shared values and founding principles. This declaration represents military officers taking a stand for those principles - and that's something worth paying attention to, regardless of your political leanings.
Check out the full video here.
I've been deep in the rabbit hole of what might be the most significant event in Bitcoin's history, and I want to share my findings with you. On July 4th, 2025 (American Independence Day), something extraordinary happened: $8.6 billion worth of Bitcoin was simultaneously moved from eight wallets that had been dormant for over 14 years.
This wasn't just any random transaction. Each wallet contained exactly 10,000 BTC in perfect symmetry, and all were moved with surgical precision in what appears to be a carefully orchestrated demonstration. What makes this even more fascinating is the legal notice inscribed directly on the blockchain, giving the original owner 90 days (until October 5th) to come forward before the funds are considered abandoned.
When I first saw this news, I immediately recognized the connection to the Kleiman v. Wright case. For those unfamiliar, this was a massive five-year legal battle that essentially established Craig Wright's control over Satoshi's wallets as a matter of law. Despite what some might claim, Wright didn't "lose" this case – he paid a relatively small fraction ($150 million) of the estimated $60 billion fortune, with the court acknowledging his control over these assets.
What we're witnessing now appears to be one of two possibilities: either Craig Wright himself is orchestrating this as part of a larger plan involving Bitcoin SV (BSV), or someone has somehow obtained the keys to these wallets. Based on everything I've studied, including Wright's continued public presence and ongoing activities, I believe the former is far more likely.
The legal strategy here is particularly fascinating. The entity behind this movement is applying adverse possession principles – concepts traditionally used for real estate – to the digital world of cryptocurrency. In essence, they're saying: "I've taken possession of abandoned digital property, made it public, offered a contestation period, and without objection, I'll become the legitimate owner."
What strikes me most about this operation is its meticulous execution. The blockchain messages contain references to the TV show "Lost" (the famous numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42), suggesting this is as much a conceptual performance as it is a financial move. There's an artistic element to this demonstration of cryptographic power.
The big question remains: what happens on October 5th? If the announced sale takes place, we could see significant market impact. But what if, instead of converting to fiat, these funds move to BSV? Wright himself recently stated, "Bitcoin doesn't fork, it scales" and "the original Bitcoin chain is called BSV." Could this be foreshadowing his intentions?
I believe we're witnessing a sophisticated play to not only claim abandoned wallets but potentially reshape the narrative around which chain represents Satoshi's original vision. By following proper legal procedures and giving due process, whoever is behind this movement is positioning themselves to withstand the inevitable scrutiny that will come with liquidating billions in cryptocurrency.
This October 5th date will undoubtedly mark a turning point for Bitcoin. Whether you believe Craig Wright is Satoshi or not, the legal and financial implications of this movement are impossible to ignore. I'll be watching closely as we approach this deadline, and I encourage you to stay informed about what could be a watershed moment in cryptocurrency history.
Check out the full video here.
I've been following the Satoshi Bitcoin wallet situation closely, and I have to say, things are getting incredibly interesting as we approach October 5th. If you haven't been keeping up with this saga, let me catch you up on what could be one of the most significant events in Bitcoin history.
Back in July, we witnessed something extraordinary: approximately $9-10 billion worth of Bitcoin from wallets believed to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto (Bitcoin's mysterious creator) was moved to exchanges. This wasn't just a simple transfer; messages were left on the blockchain indicating these funds might be liquidated on October 5th.
What fascinates me most about this situation is the careful legal process being followed. A notice was placed directly on the blockchain giving a 90-day window for anyone with legitimate claim to these coins to come forward, either by signing the wallet addresses or contacting the specified law firm. This is essentially due process in action within the crypto world.
I recently had a thought-provoking conversation with Dimmitri about the ethics of claiming potentially abandoned coins. Think about it this way: if you found a key fob containing Bitcoin keys, what would be the responsible thing to do? You can't just take them to the police or FBI. The most ethical approach would be to announce your finding and give the rightful owner a chance to claim them, which is exactly what's happening here on a much larger scale.
From my analysis, there are really only two possibilities here: either Craig Wright (who has claimed to be Satoshi and has been involved in legal cases regarding these addresses) controls these wallets, or someone else has obtained the keys and is going through proper legal procedures to establish ownership.
What we're witnessing might effectively be the "death" of Satoshi as a persona. If the real Satoshi doesn't come forward by October 5th to sign these messages, it essentially confirms they're either gone or unable to access their keys. The crypto world will never be the same.
I'm particularly excited about exploring this topic further with my audience. I've recently partnered with Lex, an original Bitcoin expert who previously worked with Twitch and Orange Gateway, to help elevate my channel's content. Together, we'll be diving deeper into stories like this one.
This October 5th deadline represents a fascinating intersection of cryptocurrency, law, and the enduring mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto. The outcome could have significant implications for Bitcoin's narrative and possibly even its market.
Check out the full video here.
